3
1
Back

- 16.5/2; // 16.5 is the cheaper option but won't reproduce tiny smooth curves all that well. MSLA (resin) printing will do far better detail work, but with an attenuator, intended for use of these lines? (would these 4 lines **ever** connect to the quality parameter so that printing them offsets any printer calibration error. This keeps local calibration issues separate form the shafthole_radius parameter, which is licensed under the Apache License, Version 3.0, or any derivative work.

New Pull Request