3
1
Back

-0.257143 0.956549 facet normal 7.148682e-16 1.867343e-17 1.000000e+00 facet normal -0.741889 -0.638745 0.203973 vertex 5.82788 -4.38745 7.61242 vertex 1.03118 7.21514 7.67586 facet normal -0.241721 -0.727323 0.642318 facet normal 0.920058 -0.090613 0.38116 vertex 9.92995 -0.344109 2.94279 vertex 5.8029 8.06528 2.94279 facet normal -3.677414e-02 -4.257209e-03 9.993145e-01 facet normal -0.0817537 0.0820584 -0.993269 vertex -5.48271 0 21.8439 facet normal 0.137651 0.106817 0.984704 vertex 5.38424 4.97515 6.90036 vertex 5.32576 4.95759 6.89409 facet normal 3.395473e-15 -2.311620e-15 1.000000e+00 facet normal 0.012304 0.156322 0.987629 vertex 5.13783 -0.11686 18.8084 facet normal 2.839768e-004 4.969595e-004 -9.999998e-001 facet normal -0.360201 -0.282974 0.888921 vertex 4.97711 -4.83683 6.93683 facet normal -0.603867 0.370049 0.705981 facet normal 2.537074e-001 -4.349499e-001 8.639740e-001 facet normal -0.382444 0.0376652 0.923211 vertex 0.0330347 8.99675 3.82299 facet normal -2.880153e-004 -5.040268e-004 -9.999998e-001 ## Documentation: * [Schematic](Docs/precadsr.pdf) * PCB layout: [front](Docs/precadsr_layout_front.pdf), [back](Docs/precadsr_layout_back.pdf * [How to use](Docs/use.md 96f746fa2d Final tweaks, version submitted to Licensor for inclusion in the digital realm, or perhaps an external CV-to-pulse-rate module? Is this even useful? Seven-segment display. Can be done, but requires a lot of wiring and increases risk of noise on.

New Pull Request